This Issue
Real-World Uses, Beyond Trading
Why USDT Specifically Dominates
Stablecoin Lending and the Businesses Built Around It
What Countries and Banks Are Planning
Future Scope
What This Means for Readers

Stablecoins have quietly become bigger business than most people realize, and Tether's own numbers show why. Real-economy stablecoin payments doubled to roughly $400 billion in 2025, a growing lending market now pays 3.5–8% APY on parked stablecoins, and Tether alone sits on $187.75 billion in reserves as of June 2026, reserves that just posted their first-ever quarterly loss. Part 1 of this series covered how stablecoins evolved. This piece covers where they're actually used, why USDT specifically dominates, how the lending business around them works, what governments and banks are building, and where this heads next.

Cross-border remittances and payroll. Traditional remittance corridors average 6.49% in fees (World Bank, Q1 2025) and take 3–5 business days through correspondent banking. A stablecoin transfer settles in minutes at meaningfully lower cost, independent research from EY-Parthenon found 41% of current stablecoin users report cost savings of at least 10%, concentrated in cross-border B2B payments. India-US is the world's largest single remittance corridor at $129 billion a year, and Indian IT firms receiving US client payments via stablecoins report faster cash flow versus traditional wires.
Contractor and gig-economy payroll is now a live production category. Deel launched stablecoin payroll for contractors in February 2026, covering 69+ countries; Remote offers a comparable USDC contractor-payment product across a similar country count. Scale AI pays overseas contractors in stablecoins specifically to shield them from local-currency volatility. Reported savings for a company running a 50-person remote team run roughly $2,000 to $5,000 a month in transaction costs, and contractors in emerging markets who previously waited weeks for a wire now report receiving funds within hours.
B2B cross-border payments, the dominant use case by volume. One widely cited estimate puts B2B stablecoin volume at roughly $226 billion, about 60% of total "real" (non-speculative) stablecoin payment volume, as of early 2026, up from under $100 million a month as recently as early 2023. Commerce-related stablecoin payments overall, as distinct from exchange trading activity, more than doubled in 2025 and now represent roughly 10% of total stablecoin transaction volume, per McKinsey's 2025 Global Payments Report. Settlement finality is part of the appeal: under 400 milliseconds on Solana, 15 seconds on Ethereum, 1–2 seconds on TRON, versus SWIFT GPI, which still can't guarantee same-day settlement in every corridor.
Creator and marketplace payouts. Content platforms and marketplaces are adopting stablecoin payouts for the same reason gig platforms are, speed and currency stability for a genuinely global workforce. A US company paying a Brazilian creator, for instance, can settle in minutes instead of navigating SWIFT delays and a 5–10% FX spread. Visa, PayPal, and Stripe have each built stablecoin payout infrastructure marketed at this use case through 2026.
Everyday spending is smaller but growing fast. Stablecoin-linked card spending reached roughly $18 billion on an annualised basis in early 2026, compounding at around 106% a year since January 2023, still a small slice of overall card volume, but the growth rate signals stablecoins moving toward everyday commerce rather than staying confined to trading and treasury.
Treasury and liquidity management. Businesses increasingly hold stablecoins as working capital, moving value between wallets, entities, and jurisdictions without waiting on banking hours or correspondent chains, increasingly supported by on-chain FX liquidity pools for pairs like USDC to local currencies.
Adoption breadth. Active stablecoin wallets grew from roughly 19.6 million in February 2024 to just over 30 million by February 2025, about 53% year-on-year, a broader base than trading-only usage would suggest. Looking further out, EY-Parthenon projects 5–10% of all cross-border payments could run through stablecoins by 2030, representing $2.1–4.2 trillion in value, a wide range worth treating as a directional estimate rather than a firm forecast.

USDT and USDC together make up roughly 83% of total stablecoin supply, but they don't serve identical roles. USDC leans toward regulated, US-centric institutional flows, PayPal's PYUSD and BUIDL-style tokenized Treasury products sit in the same lane. USDT's strength is different: it is the default dollar-access instrument in markets where banking infrastructure is weakest or least trusted, which is exactly where grassroots crypto adoption research consistently finds the heaviest usage.
Tether's own reserve data adds texture to this. As of June 2026, its $187.75 billion in reserves runs at least 74.8% in U.S. Treasury bills and repo, and the real Treasury-linked exposure is likely higher still, money market fund holdings were about 73.4% indirectly Treasury-backed as of the last full breakdown, and overnight repo collateral was effectively 100% Treasuries (precisely 99.97%). The rest sits in precious metals (around 9.9%, up from $3.39B, or 4.1% of reserves, in March 2023, the earliest period in this dataset with a full breakdown), secured loans (around 7.1%, a category that draws the most analyst scrutiny since "secured" doesn't specify collateral quality), and Bitcoin (around 3.0%). Notably, Tether also runs a separate, non-reserve investment arm, Tether Investments Ltd, explicitly not part of USDT's backing, that grew from $4.78 billion to $12.44 billion in equity in just nine months through 2024, funded by profits from the reserve business itself. And the most recent report shows the reserve side under real pressure: a cumulative net loss of $3.17 billion for the first half of 2026, implying a standalone Q2 loss of roughly $4.21 billion (versus a $1.04 billion gain in Q1 alone), cut the equity cushion by close to half quarter-on-quarter. All of this comes from BDO ISAE 3000 assurance reports, an internationally recognised standard, but explicitly not the same as a full financial-statement audit under GAAP or GAAS.
Holding stablecoins doesn't have to mean holding them idle. A real lending market has grown around them, split into two broad models:
DeFi lending protocols: Aave, Compound, Morpho, and Spark let users deposit stablecoins into liquidity pools; borrowers post crypto collateral and pay interest to borrow against it, typically for leverage or arbitrage. Aave alone holds roughly $20–26 billion in total value locked across 22+ networks, making it the largest venue by a wide margin. Yields compressed through 2026 as leverage demand cooled, Aave's USDC rate sat around 2.61% in April 2026, though the wider DeFi range runs 3.5–9% APY depending on platform and risk tier.
CeFi lending platforms: centralized services that manage deposits on a user's behalf, publish audits, and use institutional custody, generally offering higher, steadier rates (roughly 6.5–8.5% APY on USDT for established platforms) in exchange for counterparty trust rather than smart-contract risk.
Issuer-side yield products are a third, newer lane. Since the GENIUS Act bars US payment-stablecoin issuers from paying yield directly to holders, platforms built around tokenized Treasury products (BUIDL, USDY) and yield-bearing stablecoin variants (Aave's aUSDC, MakerDAO's sDAI) have emerged to offer yield through a separate product layer instead. The mechanism underneath all of these is the same idea Tether's own reserves illustrate: an issuer takes in stablecoins or fiat, deploys the capital into yield-generating assets, mostly Treasuries, and shares a portion of that return.
Governments are running two different playbooks, and several are running both at once.
On the bank and payments-industry side, activity has moved well beyond early pilots into competing live products:

The throughline across nearly every institution above: as of 2026, holding back and waiting has largely stopped being the strategy. The GENIUS Act's passage in July 2025 is widely credited with converting stablecoins from a supervisory risk for banks into a product line worth competing in directly.
A few directions this is heading, based on where regulation and product development are pointed right now: tokenized bank deposits as a parallel track to stablecoins, letting banks offer blockchain-native settlement without ceding the deposit relationship, already underway with The Clearing House's shared network; deeper TradFi integration, tokenized Treasury funds like BUIDL already trading on public DEXs; the CBDC-vs-private-stablecoin question staying unresolved, with most major economies hedging by building both rather than picking one; consolidation and shared-infrastructure models, illustrated by Open Standard's 140-plus-company coalition betting that shared governance beats a single dominant issuer; and continued scrutiny of reserve composition and issuer transparency, an area where Tether's own trajectory, growing non-Treasury allocations, a newly disclosed investment arm, and a first loss-making quarter, shows exactly why that scrutiny is warranted even for the largest, most established player.
India Crypto Research operates independently. The information presented herein is intended solely for educational and informational purposes and should not be construed as financial advice. Before making any financial decisions, it's essential to undertake your own thorough research and analysis. If you're uncertain about any financial matters, we strongly recommend seeking guidance from an impartial financial advisor.